GeForce 830M vs GeForce GTX 460 v2
When choosing between GeForce 830M and GeForce GTX 460 v2, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce 830M and GeForce GTX 460 v2.
GeForce GTX 460 v2
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce 830M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 830M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 830M here:
Main Specs
GeForce 830M | GeForce GTX 460 v2 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 160 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 has 384% more power consumption, than GeForce 830M.
- GeForce 830M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GeForce GTX 460 v2 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce 830M has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- GeForce 830M is used in Laptops, and GeForce GTX 460 v2 - in Desktops.
- GeForce 830M is build with Maxwell architecture, and GeForce GTX 460 v2 - with Fermi 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 830M is 250 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- GeForce 830M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 460 v2 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 v2 is 2208 MHz higher, than GeForce 830M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than GeForce 830M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Battlefield 5 is 155% more, than GeForce 830M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 830M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 51% more, than GeForce 830M. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
GeForce 830M and GeForce GTX 460 v2 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Dota 2 is 45% more, than GeForce 830M. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Far Cry 5 is 225% more, than GeForce 830M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Fortnite is 84% more, than GeForce 830M. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Forza Horizon 4 is 137% more, than GeForce 830M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | − | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Grand Theft Auto V is 72% more, than GeForce 830M. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Metro Exodus is 266% more, than GeForce 830M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Minecraft is 16% more, than GeForce 830M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 44% more, than GeForce 830M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 216% more, than GeForce 830M. | ||
low / 768p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 240% more, than GeForce 830M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in World of Tanks is 35% more, than GeForce 830M. |
Full Specs
GeForce 830M | GeForce GTX 460 v2 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | N15? | GF114 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 12 March 2014 | 24 September 2011 |
Pipelines | 256 | 336 |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 779 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 18.40 | 43.62 |
Floating-point performance | 588.8 gflops | 1,045.6 gflops |
Length | 210 mm | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 4008 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 96.19 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | + | 2.1 |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 67 Mh/s | 75 Mh/s |
Optimus | + | |
GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
GameWorks | + | |
Check Price |