GeForce 830M vs GRID K520
When choosing between GeForce 830M and GRID K520, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce 830M and GRID K520.
GRID K520
GeForce 830M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 830M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 830M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 830M | GRID K520 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K520 has 581% more power consumption, than GeForce 830M.
- GeForce 830M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GRID K520 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GRID K520 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce 830M.
- GeForce 830M is used in Laptops, and GRID K520 - in Desktops.
- GeForce 830M is build with Maxwell architecture, and GRID K520 - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 830M is 284 MHz higher, than GRID K520.
- GeForce 830M and GRID K520 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K520 is 3200 MHz higher, than GeForce 830M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 283% more, than GeForce 830M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Battlefield 5 is 300% more, than GeForce 830M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 830M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 140−150 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 105% more, than GeForce 830M. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than GeForce 830M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Dota 2 is 93% more, than GeForce 830M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Far Cry 5 is 425% more, than GeForce 830M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Fortnite is 187% more, than GeForce 830M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Forza Horizon 4 is 285% more, than GeForce 830M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | − | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Grand Theft Auto V is 155% more, than GeForce 830M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Metro Exodus is 533% more, than GeForce 830M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Minecraft is 22% more, than GeForce 830M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than GeForce 830M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 433% more, than GeForce 830M. | ||
| low / 768p | 9−10 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 460% more, than GeForce 830M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in World of Tanks is 66% more, than GeForce 830M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 830M | GRID K520 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Code name | N15? | GK104 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 12 March 2014 | 23 July 2013 |
| Pipelines | 256 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 18.40 | 95.36 |
| Floating-point performance | 588.8 gflops | 2x 2,448 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 3.0 |
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 67 Mh/s | 76 Mh/s |
| Optimus | + | |
| GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
| GameWorks | + | |
| Check Price |