FirePro M4000 vs GeForce 840A
When choosing between FirePro M4000 and GeForce 840A, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro M4000 and GeForce 840A.
GeForce 840A
FirePro M4000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M4000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M4000 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M4000 | GeForce 840A | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 33 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 33 Watt.
- FirePro M4000 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and GeForce 840A uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GeForce 840A has 1 GB more memory, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 is used in Mobile workstations, and GeForce 840A - in Desktops.
- FirePro M4000 is build with GCN architecture, and GeForce 840A - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 840A is 429 MHz higher, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 and GeForce 840A are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M4000 is 2498 MHz higher, than GeForce 840A.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Battlefield 5 is 63% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 17% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 29% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 840A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Dota 2 is 23% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Far Cry 5 is 57% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Fortnite is 40% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 66% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | − |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 30% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Metro Exodus is 75% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Minecraft is 6% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 37% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| low / 768p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 60% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in World of Tanks is 23% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M4000 | GeForce 840A | |
| Architecture | GCN | Maxwell |
| Code name | Cape Verde GLM | GM108 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 July 2012 | 17 March 2014 |
| Pipelines | 512 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 1029 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 21.60 | 17.98 |
| Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | 863.2 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 2002 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 16.02 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| Bus support | n/a | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 79 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Form factor | MXM-A | |
| StereoOutput3D | + | |
| Check Price |