FirePro W5170M vs GeForce 840A
When choosing between FirePro W5170M and GeForce 840A, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro W5170M and GeForce 840A.
GeForce 840A
FirePro W5170M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro W5170M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W5170M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro W5170M | GeForce 840A | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro W5170M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and GeForce 840A uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- FirePro W5170M and GeForce 840A have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- FirePro W5170M is used in Mobile workstations, and GeForce 840A - in Desktops.
- FirePro W5170M is build with GCN architecture, and GeForce 840A - with Maxwell.
- FirePro W5170M and GeForce 840A are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W5170M is 2498 MHz higher, than GeForce 840A.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5170M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 133% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5170M in Battlefield 5 is 109% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro W5170M and GeForce 840A have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 170−180 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 140−150 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 110−120 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5170M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 56% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 840A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than FirePro W5170M. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5170M in Dota 2 is 44% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5170M in Far Cry 5 is 114% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5170M in Fortnite is 77% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5170M in Forza Horizon 4 is 116% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | − |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5170M in Grand Theft Auto V is 70% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5170M in Metro Exodus is 175% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−105 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5170M in Minecraft is 17% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5170M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 61% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5170M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 75% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5170M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 120% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5170M in World of Tanks is 46% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro W5170M | GeForce 840A | |
| Architecture | GCN | Maxwell |
| Code name | Tropo | GM108 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 2 October 2015 | 17 March 2014 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 925 MHz | 1124 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 37.00 | 17.98 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,184 gflops | 863.2 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 2002 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 16.02 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| AppAcceleration | + | |
| Check Price |