GeForce 840A vs GeForce GTX 760M
In this comparison between GeForce 840A and GeForce GTX 760M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce 840A will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 760M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce 840A
GeForce GTX 760M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 760M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 760M here:
Main Specs
GeForce 840A | GeForce GTX 760M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 55 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 760M has 66% more power consumption, than GeForce 840A.
- GeForce 840A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GeForce GTX 760M uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce 840A and GeForce GTX 760M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- GeForce 840A is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 760M - in Laptops.
- GeForce 840A is build with Maxwell architecture, and GeForce GTX 760M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 840A is 372 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760M.
- GeForce 840A and GeForce GTX 760M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce 840A is 2 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Battlefield 5 is 63% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 17% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 24% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 840A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Dota 2 is 15% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Far Cry 5 is 57% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Fortnite is 36% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Forza Horizon 4 is 50% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | − | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Grand Theft Auto V is 30% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Metro Exodus is 75% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Minecraft is 6% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 37% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 60% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in World of Tanks is 23% more, than GeForce 840A. |
Full Specs
GeForce 840A | GeForce GTX 760M | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
Code name | GM108 | N14E-GL |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 17 March 2014 | 30 May 2013 |
Pipelines | 384 | 768 |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 657 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | 657 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,540 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 17.98 | 42.05 |
Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | 1,009 gflops |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz | 2000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 16.02 GB/s | 64.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 API |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 5.0 | + |
CUDA cores | 768 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 54 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
Check Price |