GeForce 840A vs GRID K260Q
When choosing between GeForce 840A and GRID K260Q, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce 840A and GRID K260Q.
GeForce 840A
GRID K260Q
Main Specs
GeForce 840A | GRID K260Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- GRID K260Q has 581% more power consumption, than GeForce 840A.
- GeForce 840A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GRID K260Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce 840A and GRID K260Q have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce 840A is build with Maxwell architecture, and GRID K260Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 840A is 284 MHz higher, than GRID K260Q.
- GeForce 840A and GRID K260Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K260Q is 2998 MHz higher, than GeForce 840A.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 216% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Battlefield 5 is 209% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce 840A and GRID K260Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 95−100 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 140−150 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 95% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Dota 2 is 73% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Far Cry 5 is 185% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Fortnite is 118% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 191% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | − | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 120% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Metro Exodus is 250% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Minecraft is 27% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 88% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 137% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 200% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in World of Tanks is 64% more, than GeForce 840A. |
Full Specs
GeForce 840A | GRID K260Q | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
Code name | GM108 | GK104 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Release date | 17 March 2014 | 28 June 2013 |
Pipelines | 384 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 745 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 17.98 | 95.36 |
Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 16.02 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 5.0 | 3.0 |