GeForce 840A vs Iris Graphics 550
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce 840A and Iris Graphics 550. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce 840A and Iris Graphics 550. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce 840A
Iris Graphics 550 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Graphics 550 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 550 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 840A | Iris Graphics 550 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
| Memory type | DDR3 | eDRAM |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 64 MB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce 840A has 120% more power consumption, than Iris Graphics 550.
- GeForce 840A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Iris Graphics 550 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- Iris Graphics 550 has 62 GB more memory, than GeForce 840A.
- GeForce 840A is used in Desktops, and Iris Graphics 550 - in Laptops.
- GeForce 840A is build with Maxwell architecture, and Iris Graphics 550 - with Gen. 9 Skylake.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 840A is 729 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 550.
- GeForce 840A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Graphics 550 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Battlefield 5 is 81% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce 840A and Iris Graphics 550 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 160−170 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 43% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 840A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Dota 2 is 32% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Far Cry 5 is 85% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Fortnite is 54% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Forza Horizon 4 is 83% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | − | 55−60 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Grand Theft Auto V is 50% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Metro Exodus is 125% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Minecraft is 11% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 38% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 50% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 80% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in World of Tanks is 35% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 840A | Iris Graphics 550 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Gen. 9 Skylake |
| Code name | GM108 | Skylake GT3e |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 17 March 2014 | 1 September 2015 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 48 |
| Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| Transistor count | 189 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.98 | 52.80 |
| Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 16.02 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.97 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |