GeForce 840A vs Quadro K5000M
In this comparison between GeForce 840A and Quadro K5000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce 840A will be the best choice, for others Quadro K5000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce 840A
Quadro K5000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K5000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K5000M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 840A | Quadro K5000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro K5000M has 203% more power consumption, than GeForce 840A.
- GeForce 840A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Quadro K5000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Quadro K5000M has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce 840A.
- GeForce 840A is used in Desktops, and Quadro K5000M - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce 840A is build with Maxwell architecture, and Quadro K5000M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 840A is 323 MHz higher, than Quadro K5000M.
- GeForce 840A and Quadro K5000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K5000M is 998 MHz higher, than GeForce 840A.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 233% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Battlefield 5 is 227% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce 840A and Quadro K5000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 140−150 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 98% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Dota 2 is 78% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Far Cry 5 is 214% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Fortnite is 136% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 225% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | − | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 130% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Metro Exodus is 300% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Minecraft is 26% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 162% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 210% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in World of Tanks is 66% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 840A | Quadro K5000M | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Code name | GM108 | N14E-Q5 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 17 March 2014 | 1 June 2012 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1344 |
| Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 706 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.98 | 67.31 |
| Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | 1,615 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz | 3000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 16.02 GB/s | 96 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | + |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 51 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |