GeForce 840A vs Quadro M2000M
When comparing GeForce 840A and Quadro M2000M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce 840A and Quadro M2000M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce 840A
Quadro M2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2000M here:
Main Specs
GeForce 840A | Quadro M2000M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 55 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro M2000M has 66% more power consumption, than GeForce 840A.
- GeForce 840A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Quadro M2000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- Quadro M2000M has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce 840A.
- GeForce 840A is used in Desktops, and Quadro M2000M - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce 840A and Quadro M2000M are build with Maxwell architecture.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M2000M is 9 MHz higher, than GeForce 840A.
- GeForce 840A and Quadro M2000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M2000M is 2998 MHz higher, than GeForce 840A.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Battlefield 5 is 263% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 30% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 116% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 19% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Dota 2 is 90% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Far Cry 5 is 257% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Fortnite is 163% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 266% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 150% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Metro Exodus is 350% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Minecraft is 32% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 187% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 260% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in World of Tanks is 58% more, than GeForce 840A. |
Full Specs
GeForce 840A | Quadro M2000M | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell |
Code name | GM108 | GM107 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 17 March 2014 | 2 October 2015 |
Pipelines | 384 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 1038 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | 1197 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 17.98 | 43.92 |
Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | 1,405 gflops |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 16.02 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 173 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |