GeForce 840A vs Radeon Pro 460
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce 840A and Radeon Pro 460, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce 840A stacks up against Radeon Pro 460, check out specs charts below.
GeForce 840A
Radeon Pro 460 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 460 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 460 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 840A | Radeon Pro 460 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Radeon Pro 460 has 6% more power consumption, than GeForce 840A.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x8 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon Pro 460 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce 840A.
- GeForce 840A is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 460 - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce 840A is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon Pro 460 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 840A is 129 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 460.
- GeForce 840A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 460 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 460 is 2998 MHz higher, than GeForce 840A.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 250% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Battlefield 5 is 263% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 30% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 109% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 19% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Dota 2 is 86% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Far Cry 5 is 242% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Fortnite is 159% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Forza Horizon 4 is 250% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Grand Theft Auto V is 150% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Metro Exodus is 350% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Minecraft is 32% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 162% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 250% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in World of Tanks is 58% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 840A | Radeon Pro 460 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Polaris |
| Code name | GM108 | Polaris 11 / Baffin XT |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 17 March 2014 | 8 August 2016 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1024 |
| Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | 907 MHz |
| Transistor count | 3,000 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.98 | 58.05 |
| Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | 1,858 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 16.02 GB/s | 81.28 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 227 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |