FirePro S10000 vs GeForce 840M
When choosing between FirePro S10000 and GeForce 840M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro S10000 and GeForce 840M.
FirePro S10000
GeForce 840M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 840M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 840M here:
Main Specs
FirePro S10000 | GeForce 840M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 750 Watt | 33 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro S10000 has 2172% more power consumption, than GeForce 840M.
- FirePro S10000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce 840M uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- FirePro S10000 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce 840M.
- FirePro S10000 is used in Desktops, and GeForce 840M - in Laptops.
- FirePro S10000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GeForce 840M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 840M is 204 MHz higher, than FirePro S10000.
- FirePro S10000 and GeForce 840M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S10000 is 3000 MHz higher, than GeForce 840M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 683% more, than GeForce 840M. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Battlefield 5 is 688% more, than GeForce 840M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce 840M. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 185% more, than GeForce 840M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 840M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than FirePro S10000. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Dota 2 is 125% more, than GeForce 840M. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Far Cry 5 is 1000% more, than GeForce 840M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Fortnite is 443% more, than GeForce 840M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 766% more, than GeForce 840M. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 361% more, than GeForce 840M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 5−6 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than GeForce 840M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Minecraft is 41% more, than GeForce 840M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than GeForce 840M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 740% more, than GeForce 840M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 12−14 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 9−10 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 942% more, than GeForce 840M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in World of Tanks is 63% more, than GeForce 840M. |
Full Specs
FirePro S10000 | GeForce 840M | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
Code name | Tahiti | N15S-GT |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 12 November 2012 | 12 March 2014 |
Pipelines | 4096 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 1029 MHz |
Boost Clock | 950 MHz | 1124 MHz |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 106.4 | 17.98 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 3,405 gflops | 863.2 gflops |
Length | 305 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 2000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 480 GB/s | 16.02 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 383 Mh/s | 92 Mh/s |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
GameWorks | + | |
Check Price |