FirePro V5800 vs GeForce 840M
In this comparison between FirePro V5800 and GeForce 840M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro V5800 will be the best choice, for others GeForce 840M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro V5800
GeForce 840M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 840M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 840M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro V5800 | GeForce 840M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 74 Watt | 33 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro V5800 has 124% more power consumption, than GeForce 840M.
- FirePro V5800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce 840M uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GeForce 840M has 3 GB more memory, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is used in Desktops, and GeForce 840M - in Laptops.
- FirePro V5800 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and GeForce 840M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 840M is 339 MHz higher, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GeForce 840M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro V5800 is 2000 MHz higher, than GeForce 840M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than GeForce 840M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Battlefield 5 is 55% more, than GeForce 840M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce 840M. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 14% more, than GeForce 840M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 840M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 19% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Dota 2 is 7% more, than GeForce 840M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than GeForce 840M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Fortnite is 36% more, than GeForce 840M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Forza Horizon 4 is 77% more, than GeForce 840M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | − |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Grand Theft Auto V is 27% more, than GeForce 840M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Metro Exodus is 133% more, than GeForce 840M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Minecraft is 2% more, than GeForce 840M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 16% more, than GeForce 840M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 80% more, than GeForce 840M. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 85% more, than GeForce 840M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in World of Tanks is 12% more, than GeForce 840M. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro V5800 | GeForce 840M | |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Maxwell |
| Code name | Juniper | N15S-GT |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 26 April 2010 | 12 March 2014 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 690 MHz | 1029 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 27.60 | 17.98 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,104.0 gflops | 863.2 gflops |
| Length | 229 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 16.02 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 92 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
| GameWorks | + | |
| Check Price |