FirePro W8100 vs GeForce 840M
In this comparison between FirePro W8100 and GeForce 840M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W8100 will be the best choice, for others GeForce 840M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro W8100
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce 840M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 840M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 840M here:
Main Specs
FirePro W8100 | GeForce 840M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 220 Watt | 33 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro W8100 has 566% more power consumption, than GeForce 840M.
- FirePro W8100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce 840M uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- FirePro W8100 has 4 GB more memory, than GeForce 840M.
- FirePro W8100 is used in Desktops, and GeForce 840M - in Laptops.
- FirePro W8100 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and GeForce 840M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 840M is 205 MHz higher, than FirePro W8100.
- FirePro W8100 and GeForce 840M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W8100 is 3000 MHz higher, than GeForce 840M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 683% more, than GeForce 840M. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Battlefield 5 is 711% more, than GeForce 840M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce 840M. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 185% more, than GeForce 840M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 840M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than FirePro W8100. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Dota 2 is 125% more, than GeForce 840M. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Far Cry 5 is 1000% more, than GeForce 840M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Fortnite is 443% more, than GeForce 840M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 766% more, than GeForce 840M. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | − |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 361% more, than GeForce 840M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 5−6 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than GeForce 840M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Minecraft is 41% more, than GeForce 840M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than GeForce 840M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 740% more, than GeForce 840M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 12−14 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 9−10 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 942% more, than GeForce 840M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in World of Tanks is 63% more, than GeForce 840M. |
Full Specs
FirePro W8100 | GeForce 840M | |
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Maxwell |
Code name | Hawaii | N15S-GT |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 23 June 2014 | 12 March 2014 |
Pipelines | 2560 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 824 MHz | 1029 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | |
Transistor count | 6,200 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 131.8 | 17.98 |
Floating-point performance | 4,219 gflops | 863.2 gflops |
Length | 279 mm | |
Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 2000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 320 GB/s | 16.02 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 466 Mh/s | 92 Mh/s |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
GameWorks | + | |
Check Price |