GeForce 840M vs Radeon Sky 500
In this comparison between GeForce 840M and Radeon Sky 500 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce 840M will be the best choice, for others Radeon Sky 500 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon Sky 500
GeForce 840M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 840M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 840M here:
Main Specs
GeForce 840M | Radeon Sky 500 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 150 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- Radeon Sky 500 has 354% more power consumption, than GeForce 840M.
- GeForce 840M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Radeon Sky 500 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce 840M and Radeon Sky 500 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- GeForce 840M is used in Laptops, and Radeon Sky 500 - in Desktops.
- GeForce 840M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon Sky 500 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 840M is 79 MHz higher, than Radeon Sky 500.
- GeForce 840M and Radeon Sky 500 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Sky 500 is 2800 MHz higher, than GeForce 840M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 683% more, than GeForce 840M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Battlefield 5 is 688% more, than GeForce 840M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce 840M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 185% more, than GeForce 840M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 840M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Radeon Sky 500. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Dota 2 is 125% more, than GeForce 840M. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Far Cry 5 is 1000% more, than GeForce 840M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Fortnite is 443% more, than GeForce 840M. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Forza Horizon 4 is 766% more, than GeForce 840M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Grand Theft Auto V is 361% more, than GeForce 840M. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 5−6 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than GeForce 840M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Minecraft is 41% more, than GeForce 840M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than GeForce 840M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 740% more, than GeForce 840M. | ||
low / 768p | 12−14 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 9−10 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 942% more, than GeForce 840M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in World of Tanks is 63% more, than GeForce 840M. |
Full Specs
GeForce 840M | Radeon Sky 500 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | N15S-GT | Pitcairn |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 12 March 2014 | 27 March 2013 |
Pipelines | 384 | 1280 |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 950 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,800 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 17.98 | 76.00 |
Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | 2,432 gflops |
Length | 242 mm | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 4800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 16.02 GB/s | 154 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | + | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 92 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
GameWorks | + | |
Check Price |