GeForce 840M vs Tesla M60
When comparing GeForce 840M and Tesla M60, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce 840M and Tesla M60 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Tesla M60
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce 840M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 840M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 840M here:
Main Specs
GeForce 840M | Tesla M60 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 300 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Tesla M60 has 809% more power consumption, than GeForce 840M.
- GeForce 840M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Tesla M60 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M60 has 4 GB more memory, than GeForce 840M.
- GeForce 840M is used in Laptops, and Tesla M60 - in Desktops.
- GeForce 840M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Tesla M60 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 840M is 472 MHz higher, than Tesla M60.
- GeForce 840M and Tesla M60 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M60 is 3012 MHz higher, than GeForce 840M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 716% more, than GeForce 840M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Battlefield 5 is 766% more, than GeForce 840M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce 840M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 185% more, than GeForce 840M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 840M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Tesla M60. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Dota 2 is 125% more, than GeForce 840M. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 30−33 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Far Cry 5 is 1060% more, than GeForce 840M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 30−33 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Fortnite is 468% more, than GeForce 840M. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Forza Horizon 4 is 822% more, than GeForce 840M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | − | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Grand Theft Auto V is 372% more, than GeForce 840M. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 5−6 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Metro Exodus is 1400% more, than GeForce 840M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Minecraft is 41% more, than GeForce 840M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than GeForce 840M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 780% more, than GeForce 840M. | ||
low / 768p | 12−14 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 9−10 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 971% more, than GeForce 840M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in World of Tanks is 59% more, than GeForce 840M. |
Full Specs
GeForce 840M | Tesla M60 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | N15S-GT | GM204 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 12 March 2014 | 30 August 2015 |
Pipelines | 384 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 557 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | 1178 MHz |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 17.98 | 150.8 |
Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | 2x 4,833 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 16.02 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | 5.2 |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 92 Mh/s | 432 Mh/s |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
GameWorks | + | |
Check Price |