FirePro M6100 vs GeForce 845M

When choosing between FirePro M6100 and GeForce 845M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro M6100 and GeForce 845M.

FirePro M6100 Check Price

GeForce 845M Check Price

FirePro M6100 and GeForce 845M are Laptop Graphics Cards

Note: FirePro M6100 and GeForce 845M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M6100 or GeForce 845M here:

FirePro M6100 Laptops

GeForce 845M Laptops

Main Specs

	FirePro M6100	GeForce 845M
Power consumption (TDP)		45 Watt
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	None
Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3, GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro M6100 is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and GeForce 845M uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
FirePro M6100 and GeForce 845M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
FirePro M6100 is build with GCN architecture, and GeForce 845M - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of FirePro M6100 is 29 MHz higher, than GeForce 845M.
FirePro M6100 and GeForce 845M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro M6100 is 4000 MHz higher, than GeForce 845M.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	10−11	3−4
ultra / 1080p	6−7	1−2
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	21−24	14−16
medium / 1080p	12−14	6−7
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 116% more, than GeForce 845M.
high / 1080p	16−18	10−11
ultra / 1080p	14−16	7−8
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	35−40	21−24
medium / 1080p	18−20	10−11
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in Battlefield 5 is 83% more, than GeForce 845M.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
high / 1080p	−	40−45
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
FirePro M6100 and GeForce 845M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	170−180	130−140
medium / 768p	140−150	100−110
ultra / 1080p	70−75	50−55
QHD / 1440p	40−45	24−27
4K / 2160p	30−33	12−14
high / 768p	100−110	75−80
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 39% more, than GeForce 845M.
low / 768p	55−60	85−90
ultra / 1080p	27−30	21−24
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 845M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 18% more, than FirePro M6100.
low / 768p	95−100	75−80
medium / 768p	75−80	50−55
ultra / 1080p	45−50	30−33
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in Dota 2 is 39% more, than GeForce 845M.
high / 1080p	12−14	4−5
ultra / 1080p	10−12	4−5
4K / 2160p	4−5	2−3
low / 720p	27−30	14−16
medium / 1080p	12−14	6−7
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in Far Cry 5 is 133% more, than GeForce 845M.
high / 1080p	18−20	6−7
ultra / 1080p	14−16	0−1
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	75−80	55−60
medium / 1080p	35−40	16−18
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in Fortnite is 62% more, than GeForce 845M.
high / 1080p	16−18	9−10
ultra / 1080p	14−16	8−9
QHD / 1440p	4−5	3−4
4K / 2160p	−	3−4
low / 720p	35−40	21−24
medium / 1080p	20−22	10−12
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 72% more, than GeForce 845M.
low / 768p	65−70	50−55
medium / 768p	55−60	−
high / 1080p	18−20	10−11
ultra / 1080p	8−9	4−5
QHD / 1440p	0−1	−
medium / 720p	−	40−45
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 40% more, than GeForce 845M.
high / 1080p	6−7	3−4
ultra / 1080p	5−6	1−2
4K / 2160p	1−2	−
low / 720p	18−20	10−11
medium / 1080p	9−10	4−5
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than GeForce 845M.
low / 768p	100−110	90−95
high / 1080p	−	65−70
ultra / 1080p	90−95	−
medium / 1080p	95−100	90−95
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in Minecraft is 9% more, than GeForce 845M.
high / 1080p	18−20	5−6
ultra / 1080p	14−16	1−2
4K / 2160p	−	0−1
low / 720p	40−45	27−30
medium / 1080p	20−22	9−10
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 118% more, than GeForce 845M.
high / 1080p	12−14	−
ultra / 1080p	8−9	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	−
low / 720p	18−20	10−11
medium / 1080p	12−14	8−9
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 77% more, than GeForce 845M.
low / 768p	35−40	20−22
medium / 768p	21−24	12−14
high / 1080p	12−14	6−7
ultra / 1080p	8−9	4−5
4K / 2160p	7−8	3−4
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 88% more, than GeForce 845M.
low / 768p	90−95	75−80
medium / 768p	50−55	40−45
ultra / 1080p	24−27	16−18
high / 768p	45−50	30−35
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in World of Tanks is 28% more, than GeForce 845M.

Full Specs

	FirePro M6100	GeForce 845M
Architecture	GCN	Maxwell
Code name	Bonaire	GM108
Type	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	1 October 2013	12 March 2014
Pipelines	768	384
Core clock speed	1100 MHz	1071 MHz
Boost Clock		1150 MHz
Transistor count	2,080 million	1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	51.60	37.63
Floating-point performance	1,651 gflops	883.7 gflops
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed	6000 MHz	2000 - 5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	88 GB/s	40.1 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-
DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	6.3	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.1.126
CUDA		+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	196 Mh/s	76 Mh/s
Laptop size	large	medium sized
Optimus		+
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro M6100 vs GeForce 845M

FirePro M6100 and GeForce 845M are Laptop Graphics Cards

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares