GeForce 845M vs Quadro FX 4800
In this comparison between GeForce 845M and Quadro FX 4800 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce 845M will be the best choice, for others Quadro FX 4800 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro FX 4800
GeForce 845M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 845M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 845M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 845M | Quadro FX 4800 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1536 MB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
| Check Price |
- Quadro FX 4800 has 233% more power consumption, than GeForce 845M.
- GeForce 845M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Quadro FX 4800 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro FX 4800 has 1534 GB more memory, than GeForce 845M.
- GeForce 845M is used in Laptops, and Quadro FX 4800 - in Desktops.
- GeForce 845M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Quadro FX 4800 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 845M is 469 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
- GeForce 845M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 4800 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce 845M is 400 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 845M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 845M in Battlefield 5 is 62% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce 845M. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 845M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 13% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 845M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 18% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 845M in Dota 2 is 10% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 845M in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 845M in Fortnite is 12% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 845M in Forza Horizon 4 is 42% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 845M in Grand Theft Auto V is 17% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 845M in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Minecraft is 3% more, than GeForce 845M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 38% more, than GeForce 845M. | ||
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 845M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 66% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 20−22 | 9−10 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 845M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 80% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 845M in World of Tanks is 10% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 845M | Quadro FX 4800 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | GM108 | GT200B |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 12 March 2014 | 11 November 2008 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 1071 MHz | 602 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 1,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 37.63 | 38.53 |
| Floating-point performance | 883.7 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 - 5000 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 40.1 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
| CUDA | + | 1.3 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 76 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |