FirePro S9000 vs GeForce 8800 GTX
In this comparison between FirePro S9000 and GeForce 8800 GTX you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro S9000 will be the best choice, for others GeForce 8800 GTX will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro S9000
GeForce 8800 GTX
Main Specs
FirePro S9000 | GeForce 8800 GTX | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 155 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 2x 6-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 768 MB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
- FirePro S9000 has 125% more power consumption, than GeForce 8800 GTX.
- FirePro S9000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce 8800 GTX uses PCIe 1.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce 8800 GTX has 762 GB more memory, than FirePro S9000.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- FirePro S9000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GeForce 8800 GTX - with Tesla.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S9000 is 324 MHz higher, than GeForce 8800 GTX.
- FirePro S9000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce 8800 GTX - by 90 nm process technology.
- GeForce 8800 GTX is 3 mm longer, than FirePro S9000.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S9000 is 4600 MHz higher, than GeForce 8800 GTX.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 6100% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro S9000 and GeForce 8800 GTX have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | − |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | − |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 685% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
FirePro S9000 and GeForce 8800 GTX have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Dota 2 is 313% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
high / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Fortnite is 740% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 140−150 | 18−20 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 663% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
low / 768p | 130−140 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Minecraft is 75% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 1212% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
low / 768p | 130−140 | 0−1 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | − |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | − |
low / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 0−1 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in World of Tanks is 188% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. |
Full Specs
FirePro S9000 | GeForce 8800 GTX | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Tesla |
Code name | Tahiti | G80 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 24 August 2012 | 8 November 2006 |
Pipelines | 1792 | 128 |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 576 MHz |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | 681 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 90 nm |
Texture fill rate | 100.8 | 36.8 billion/sec |
Floating-point performance | 3,226 gflops | 345.6 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | 270 mm |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | 900 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 264 GB/s | 86.4 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 11.1 (10_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 575 | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 92 Mh/s | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |