GeForce 8800 GTX vs GeForce MX230
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce 8800 GTX and GeForce MX230, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce 8800 GTX stacks up against GeForce MX230, check out specs charts below.
GeForce 8800 GTX
GeForce MX230 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX230 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX230 here:
Main Specs
GeForce 8800 GTX | GeForce MX230 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 155 Watt | 10 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 768 MB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce 8800 GTX has 1450% more power consumption, than GeForce MX230.
- GeForce 8800 GTX is connected by PCIe 1.0 x16, and GeForce MX230 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce 8800 GTX has 764 GB more memory, than GeForce MX230.
- GeForce 8800 GTX is used in Desktops, and GeForce MX230 - in Laptops.
- GeForce 8800 GTX is build with Tesla architecture, and GeForce MX230 - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX230 is 943 MHz higher, than GeForce 8800 GTX.
- GeForce 8800 GTX is manufactured by 90 nm process technology, and GeForce MX230 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX230 is 6100 MHz higher, than GeForce 8800 GTX.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX230 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2100% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 8800 GTX in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX230 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 321% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 8800 GTX in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX230 in Dota 2 is 182% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX230 in Fortnite is 227% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | − | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX230 in Grand Theft Auto V is 252% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX230 in Minecraft is 36% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX230 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 425% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | − | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX230 in World of Tanks is 148% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. |
Full Specs
GeForce 8800 GTX | GeForce MX230 | |
Architecture | Tesla | Pascal |
Code name | G80 | N17S-G0 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 8 November 2006 | 20 February 2019 |
Pipelines | 128 | 256 |
Core clock speed | 576 MHz | 1519 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1531 MHz | |
Transistor count | 681 million | 1,800 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 36.8 billion/sec | 25.31 |
Floating-point performance | 345.6 gflops | |
Length | 270 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 7000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 86.4 GB/s | 48.06 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | + | + |
CUDA cores | 575 | |
SLI options | + | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |