GeForce 8800 GTX vs Iris Plus Graphics 655

When comparing GeForce 8800 GTX and Iris Plus Graphics 655, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce 8800 GTX and Iris Plus Graphics 655 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

GeForce 8800 GTX

Iris Plus Graphics 655 Check Price

Iris Plus Graphics 655 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Iris Plus Graphics 655 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 655 here:

Iris Plus Graphics 655 Laptops

Main Specs

	GeForce 8800 GTX	Iris Plus Graphics 655
Power consumption (TDP)	155 Watt	15 Watt
Interface	PCIe 1.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x1
Supplementary power connectors	2x 6-pin
Memory type	GDDR3	DDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount	768 MB
Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x S-Video	No outputs
		Check Price

GeForce 8800 GTX has 933% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
GeForce 8800 GTX is connected by PCIe 1.0 x16, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
GeForce 8800 GTX is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - in Laptops.
GeForce 8800 GTX is build with Tesla architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
Core clock speed of GeForce 8800 GTX is 276 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
GeForce 8800 GTX is manufactured by 90 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - by 14 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	12−14
ultra / 1080p	−	7−8
QHD / 1440p	0−1	2−3
low / 720p	1−2	27−30
medium / 1080p	0−1	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2700% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX.
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	−	18−20
QHD / 1440p	0−1	4−5
low / 720p	0−1	45−50
medium / 1080p	−	21−24
low / 768p	50−55	45−50
high / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 8800 GTX in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
low / 768p	60−65	190−200
medium / 768p	27−30	160−170
ultra / 1080p	7−8	85−90
QHD / 1440p	−	45−50
4K / 2160p	−	30−33
high / 768p	16−18	120−130
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 410% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX.
low / 768p	70−75	55−60
ultra / 1080p	0−1	35−40
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 8800 GTX in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
low / 768p	45−50	100−110
medium / 768p	10−11	85−90
ultra / 1080p	0−1	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Dota 2 is 231% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 720p	0−1	30−35
medium / 1080p	−	16−18
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	−	16−18
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
low / 720p	21−24	85−90
medium / 1080p	0−1	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Fortnite is 295% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX.
high / 1080p	0−1	21−24
ultra / 1080p	−	16−18
QHD / 1440p	0−1	7−8
low / 720p	0−1	45−50
medium / 1080p	0−1	24−27
low / 768p	18−20	75−80
medium / 768p	−	65−70
high / 1080p	0−1	24−27
ultra / 1080p	−	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	1−2
medium / 720p	12−14	−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Grand Theft Auto V is 305% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX.
high / 1080p	−	8−9
ultra / 1080p	−	6−7
4K / 2160p	−	2−3
low / 720p	0−1	24−27
medium / 1080p	−	10−12
low / 768p	75−80	100−110
high / 1080p	27−30	−
ultra / 1080p	−	95−100
medium / 1080p	−	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Minecraft is 36% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX.
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	−	16−18
low / 720p	8−9	50−55
medium / 1080p	−	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 550% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX.
high / 1080p	−	12−14
ultra / 1080p	−	9−10
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	24−27
medium / 1080p	−	14−16
low / 768p	0−1	45−50
medium / 768p	−	27−30
high / 1080p	−	16−18
ultra / 1080p	−	9−10
4K / 2160p	−	7−8
low / 768p	45−50	95−100
medium / 768p	14−16	55−60
ultra / 1080p	0−1	30−35
high / 768p	12−14	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in World of Tanks is 176% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX.

Full Specs

	GeForce 8800 GTX	Iris Plus Graphics 655
Architecture	Tesla	Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake
Code name	G80	Kaby Lake GT3e
Type	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	8 November 2006	1 September 2017
Pipelines	128	48
Core clock speed	576 MHz	300 MHz
Boost Clock		1200 MHz
Transistor count	681 million	189 million
Manufacturing process technology	90 nm	14 nm
Texture fill rate	36.8 billion/sec	50.40
Floating-point performance	345.6 gflops
Length	270 mm
Memory bus width	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	900 MHz
Memory bandwidth	86.4 GB/s
Shared memory		+
DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	4.0	6.4
OpenGL	3.3	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	2.1
Vulkan	N/A	1.1.103
CUDA	+
CUDA cores	575
SLI options	+
Quick Sync		+
		Check Price

GeForce 8800 GTX vs Iris Plus Graphics 655

Iris Plus Graphics 655 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares