GeForce 8800 GTX vs Iris Xe Graphics G7
In this comparison between GeForce 8800 GTX and Iris Xe Graphics G7 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce 8800 GTX will be the best choice, for others Iris Xe Graphics G7 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce 8800 GTX
Iris Xe Graphics G7 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Xe Graphics G7 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Xe Graphics G7 here:
Main Specs
GeForce 8800 GTX | Iris Xe Graphics G7 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 155 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 768 MB | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | |
Check Price |
- GeForce 8800 GTX is used in Desktops, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 - in Laptops.
- GeForce 8800 GTX is build with Tesla architecture, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
- GeForce 8800 GTX is manufactured by 90 nm process technology, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3100% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce 8800 GTX and Iris Xe Graphics G7 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 55−60 |
4K / 2160p | − | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 140−150 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 478% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
GeForce 8800 GTX and Iris Xe Graphics G7 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Dota 2 is 265% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Fortnite is 377% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | − | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Grand Theft Auto V is 384% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Minecraft is 49% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 675% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | − | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in World of Tanks is 176% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. |
Full Specs
GeForce 8800 GTX | Iris Xe Graphics G7 | |
Architecture | Tesla | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
Code name | G80 | Tiger Lake Xe |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 8 November 2006 | 15 August 2020 |
Pipelines | 128 | 96 |
Core clock speed | 576 MHz | |
Transistor count | 681 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 10 nm |
Texture fill rate | 36.8 billion/sec | |
Floating-point performance | 345.6 gflops | |
Length | 270 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 86.4 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | DirectX 12_1 |
Shader Model | 4.0 | |
OpenGL | 3.3 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 575 | |
SLI options | + | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce 8800 GTX vs Radeon HD 8730M
- GeForce 8800 GTX vs GeForce GT 640M LE
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs Radeon HD 8730M
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs GeForce GT 640M LE
- GeForce 8800 GTX vs GeForce GTX 770M SLI
- GeForce 8800 GTX vs Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs GeForce GTX 770M SLI
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000