GeForce 8800 GTX vs Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge
In this comparison between GeForce 8800 GTX and Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce 8800 GTX will be the best choice, for others Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce 8800 GTX
Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge here:
Main Specs
GeForce 8800 GTX | Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 155 Watt | 12-45 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 768 MB | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | |
Check Price |
- GeForce 8800 GTX has 1191% more power consumption, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge.
- GeForce 8800 GTX is used in Desktops, and Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge - in Laptops.
- GeForce 8800 GTX is build with Tesla architecture, and Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge - with GCN 1.2/2.0.
- GeForce 8800 GTX is manufactured by 90 nm process technology, and Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1400% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 8800 GTX in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 203% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 8800 GTX in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge in Dota 2 is 131% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge in Fortnite is 159% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge in Grand Theft Auto V is 181% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge in Minecraft is 45% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 250% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | − | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge in World of Tanks is 88% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. |
Full Specs
GeForce 8800 GTX | Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge | |
Architecture | Tesla | GCN 1.2/2.0 |
Code name | G80 | Bristol Ridge |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 8 November 2006 | 1 June 2016 |
Pipelines | 128 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 576 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 800 MHz | |
Transistor count | 681 million | 3100 Million |
Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 36.8 billion/sec | |
Floating-point performance | 345.6 gflops | |
Length | 270 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 86.4 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | DirectX 12 (FL 12_0) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | |
OpenGL | 3.3 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 575 | |
SLI options | + | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce 8800 GTX vs Radeon HD 8730M
- GeForce 8800 GTX vs GeForce GT 640M LE
- Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge vs Radeon HD 8730M
- Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge vs GeForce GT 640M LE
- GeForce 8800 GTX vs UHD Graphics 630
- GeForce 8800 GTX vs UHD Graphics 617
- Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge vs UHD Graphics 630
- Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge vs UHD Graphics 617