GeForce 8800M GTX SLI vs GRID K140Q
When choosing between GeForce 8800M GTX SLI and GRID K140Q, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce 8800M GTX SLI and GRID K140Q.
GRID K140Q
GeForce 8800M GTX SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 8800M GTX SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 8800M GTX SLI here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 8800M GTX SLI | GRID K140Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 130 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 130 Watt.
- GeForce 8800M GTX SLI has 511 GB more memory, than GRID K140Q.
- GeForce 8800M GTX SLI is used in Laptops, and GRID K140Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce 8800M GTX SLI is build with G9x architecture, and GRID K140Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GRID K140Q is 350 MHz higher, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI.
- GeForce 8800M GTX SLI is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and GRID K140Q - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K140Q is 982 MHz higher, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 8800M GTX SLI in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 140% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 8800M GTX SLI in Battlefield 5 is 250% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K140Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 30−33 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 8800M GTX SLI in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 39% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K140Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 8800M GTX SLI in Dota 2 is 41% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 8800M GTX SLI in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 8800M GTX SLI in Fortnite is 81% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 8800M GTX SLI in Forza Horizon 4 is 171% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | − |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 8800M GTX SLI in Grand Theft Auto V is 40% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 8800M GTX SLI in Minecraft is 28% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 8800M GTX SLI in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 31% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 8800M GTX SLI in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1000% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | − |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 8800M GTX SLI in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 650% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 8800M GTX SLI in World of Tanks is 35% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 8800M GTX SLI | GRID K140Q | |
| Architecture | G9x | Kepler |
| Code name | NB8E-GTX | GK107 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 19 November 2007 | 28 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1508 Million | 1,270 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 13.60 | |
| Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 1782 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | DirectX 10, Shader 4.0 | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |