GeForce 8800M GTX SLI vs GRID K240Q
When choosing between GeForce 8800M GTX SLI and GRID K240Q, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce 8800M GTX SLI and GRID K240Q.
GRID K240Q
GeForce 8800M GTX SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 8800M GTX SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 8800M GTX SLI here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 8800M GTX SLI | GRID K240Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- GRID K240Q has 73% more power consumption, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI.
- GeForce 8800M GTX SLI has 511 GB more memory, than GRID K240Q.
- GeForce 8800M GTX SLI is used in Laptops, and GRID K240Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce 8800M GTX SLI is build with G9x architecture, and GRID K240Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GRID K240Q is 245 MHz higher, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI.
- GeForce 8800M GTX SLI is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and GRID K240Q - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K240Q is 4200 MHz higher, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 62% more, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Battlefield 5 is 69% more, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce 8800M GTX SLI and GRID K240Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 170−180 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 140−150 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 75−80 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 40% more, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Dota 2 is 34% more, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Far Cry 5 is 75% more, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Fortnite is 42% more, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 58% more, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 42% more, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Metro Exodus is 66% more, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 100−105 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Minecraft is 14% more, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 20% more, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 55% more, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 61% more, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in World of Tanks is 19% more, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 8800M GTX SLI | GRID K240Q | |
| Architecture | G9x | Kepler |
| Code name | NB8E-GTX | GK104 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 19 November 2007 | 28 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1508 Million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | DirectX 10, Shader 4.0 | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |