GeForce 8800M GTX SLI vs GRID K520
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce 8800M GTX SLI and GRID K520. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce 8800M GTX SLI and GRID K520. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GRID K520
GeForce 8800M GTX SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 8800M GTX SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 8800M GTX SLI here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 8800M GTX SLI | GRID K520 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- GRID K520 has 73% more power consumption, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI.
- GeForce 8800M GTX SLI has 508 GB more memory, than GRID K520.
- GeForce 8800M GTX SLI is used in Laptops, and GRID K520 - in Desktops.
- GeForce 8800M GTX SLI is build with G9x architecture, and GRID K520 - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GRID K520 is 245 MHz higher, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI.
- GeForce 8800M GTX SLI is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and GRID K520 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K520 is 4200 MHz higher, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Battlefield 5 is 153% more, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce 8800M GTX SLI and GRID K520 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 140−150 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 78% more, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 19% more, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Dota 2 is 69% more, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Far Cry 5 is 162% more, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Fortnite is 103% more, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Forza Horizon 4 is 150% more, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Grand Theft Auto V is 96% more, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Metro Exodus is 166% more, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Minecraft is 19% more, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 65% more, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 122% more, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 153% more, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in World of Tanks is 41% more, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 8800M GTX SLI | GRID K520 | |
| Architecture | G9x | Kepler |
| Code name | NB8E-GTX | GK104 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 19 November 2007 | 23 July 2013 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1508 Million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 2,448 gflops | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | DirectX 10, Shader 4.0 | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 76 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |