GeForce 8800M GTX SLI vs Iris Plus Graphics 650
When comparing GeForce 8800M GTX SLI and Iris Plus Graphics 650, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce 8800M GTX SLI and Iris Plus Graphics 650 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce 8800M GTX SLI and Iris Plus Graphics 650 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce 8800M GTX SLI and Iris Plus Graphics 650 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 8800M GTX SLI or Iris Plus Graphics 650 here:
Main Specs
GeForce 8800M GTX SLI
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Power consumption (TDP)
130 Watt
15 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x1
Memory type
GDDR3
DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount
512 MB
32 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce 8800M GTX SLI has 766% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
GeForce 8800M GTX SLI has 480 GB more memory, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
GeForce 8800M GTX SLI is build with G9x architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
Core clock speed of GeForce 8800M GTX SLI is 200 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
GeForce 8800M GTX SLI is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
6−7
8−9
ultra / 1080p
4−5
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
18−20
medium / 1080p
7−8
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 25% more, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI.
high / 1080p
10−12
14−16
ultra / 1080p
9−10
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
21−24
30−33
medium / 1080p
10−12
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Battlefield 5 is 38% more, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce 8800M GTX SLI and Iris Plus Graphics 650 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
130−140
150−160
medium / 768p
100−110
120−130
ultra / 1080p
50−55
60−65
QHD / 1440p
27−30
35−40
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
high / 768p
75−80
90−95
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 18% more, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
18−20
21−24
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI.
low / 768p
75−80
85−90
medium / 768p
55−60
65−70
ultra / 1080p
30−35
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Dota 2 is 18% more, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI.
high / 1080p
7−8
10−11
ultra / 1080p
7−8
9−10
4K / 2160p
3−4
4−5
low / 720p
16−18
21−24
medium / 1080p
8−9
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Far Cry 5 is 37% more, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI.
high / 1080p
14−16
16−18
ultra / 1080p
10−11
12−14
low / 720p
55−60
65−70
medium / 1080p
21−24
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Fortnite is 19% more, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI.
high / 1080p
10−12
14−16
ultra / 1080p
10−11
12−14
QHD / 1440p
1−2
2−3
low / 720p
24−27
30−35
medium / 1080p
12−14
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Forza Horizon 4 is 33% more, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI.
low / 768p
50−55
60−65
medium / 768p
40−45
50−55
high / 1080p
10−12
16−18
ultra / 1080p
6−7
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Grand Theft Auto V is 21% more, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI.
high / 1080p
4−5
5−6
ultra / 1080p
3−4
4−5
4K / 2160p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
10−12
14−16
medium / 1080p
6−7
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Metro Exodus is 33% more, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI.
low / 768p
90−95
95−100
high / 1080p
85−90
90−95
ultra / 1080p
75−80
85−90
medium / 1080p
90−95
95−100
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Minecraft is 6% more, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI.
high / 1080p
16−18
18−20
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
30−35
35−40
medium / 1080p
16−18
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 10% more, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI.
ultra / 1080p
7−8
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
10−12
14−16
medium / 1080p
10−11
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 33% more, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI.
low / 768p
21−24
30−35
medium / 768p
16−18
20−22
high / 1080p
8−9
10−12
ultra / 1080p
6−7
7−8
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 38% more, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI.
low / 768p
85−90
90−95
medium / 768p
40−45
45−50
ultra / 1080p
18−20
21−24
high / 768p
35−40
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in World of Tanks is 10% more, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI.
Full Specs
GeForce 8800M GTX SLI
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Architecture
G9x
Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake
Code name
NB8E-GTX
Kaby Lake GT3e
Type
Laptop
Laptop
Release date
19 November 2007
3 January 2017
Pipelines
192
48
Core clock speed
500 MHz
300 MHz
Boost Clock
1100 MHz
Transistor count
1508 Million
189 million
Manufacturing process technology
65 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
55.20
Floating-point performance
883 gflops
Memory bus width
256 Bit
64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed
800 MHz
Shared memory
-
+
DirectX
DirectX 10, Shader 4.0
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
OpenCL
2.1
Vulkan
1.1.103
Laptop size
large
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
