GeForce 8800M GTX SLI vs Quadro K4200
In this comparison between GeForce 8800M GTX SLI and Quadro K4200 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce 8800M GTX SLI will be the best choice, for others Quadro K4200 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce 8800M GTX SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 8800M GTX SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 8800M GTX SLI here:
Main Specs
GeForce 8800M GTX SLI
Quadro K4200
Power consumption (TDP)
130 Watt
108 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR3
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
512 MB
4 GB
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce 8800M GTX SLI has 20% more power consumption, than Quadro K4200.
GeForce 8800M GTX SLI has 508 GB more memory, than Quadro K4200.
GeForce 8800M GTX SLI is used in Laptops, and Quadro K4200 - in Desktops.
GeForce 8800M GTX SLI is build with G9x architecture, and Quadro K4200 - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of Quadro K4200 is 271 MHz higher, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI.
GeForce 8800M GTX SLI is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and Quadro K4200 - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K4200 is 4600 MHz higher, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
6−7
21−24
ultra / 1080p
4−5
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
7−8
4K / 2160p
−
5−6
low / 720p
16−18
40−45
medium / 1080p
7−8
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 225% more, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI.
high / 1080p
10−12
35−40
ultra / 1080p
9−10
30−33
QHD / 1440p
0−1
14−16
4K / 2160p
−
9−10
low / 720p
21−24
70−75
medium / 1080p
10−12
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Battlefield 5 is 238% more, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI.
low / 768p
130−140
230−240
medium / 768p
100−110
200−210
ultra / 1080p
50−55
120−130
QHD / 1440p
27−30
100−105
4K / 2160p
−
55−60
high / 768p
75−80
170−180
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 112% more, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
18−20
50−55
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 39% more, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI.
low / 768p
75−80
120−130
medium / 768p
55−60
110−120
ultra / 1080p
30−35
80−85
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Dota 2 is 94% more, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI.
high / 1080p
7−8
27−30
ultra / 1080p
7−8
24−27
QHD / 1440p
−
20−22
4K / 2160p
3−4
8−9
low / 720p
16−18
55−60
medium / 1080p
8−9
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Far Cry 5 is 262% more, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI.
high / 1080p
14−16
35−40
ultra / 1080p
10−11
27−30
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
low / 720p
55−60
130−140
medium / 1080p
21−24
75−80
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Fortnite is 165% more, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI.
high / 1080p
10−12
35−40
ultra / 1080p
10−11
27−30
QHD / 1440p
1−2
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
14−16
low / 720p
24−27
70−75
medium / 1080p
12−14
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 225% more, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI.
low / 768p
50−55
100−110
medium / 768p
40−45
95−100
high / 1080p
10−12
40−45
ultra / 1080p
6−7
18−20
QHD / 1440p
0−1
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 135% more, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI.
high / 1080p
4−5
14−16
ultra / 1080p
3−4
10−12
QHD / 1440p
−
10−12
4K / 2160p
0−1
3−4
low / 720p
10−12
40−45
medium / 1080p
6−7
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Metro Exodus is 250% more, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI.
low / 768p
90−95
120−130
high / 1080p
85−90
−
ultra / 1080p
75−80
−
medium / 1080p
90−95
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Minecraft is 30% more, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
30−35
75−80
medium / 1080p
16−18
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 76% more, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI.
high / 1080p
−
16−18
ultra / 1080p
7−8
10−12
QHD / 1440p
0−1
2−3
4K / 2160p
−
2−3
low / 720p
10−12
40−45
medium / 1080p
10−11
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 177% more, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI.
low / 768p
21−24
80−85
medium / 768p
16−18
50−55
high / 1080p
8−9
27−30
ultra / 1080p
6−7
14−16
4K / 2160p
−
9−10
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 238% more, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI.
low / 768p
85−90
90−95
medium / 768p
40−45
60−65
ultra / 1080p
18−20
40−45
high / 768p
35−40
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in World of Tanks is 36% more, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI.
Full Specs
GeForce 8800M GTX SLI
Quadro K4200
Architecture
G9x
Kepler
Code name
NB8E-GTX
GK104
Type
Laptop
Workstation
Release date
19 November 2007
22 July 2014
Pipelines
192
1344
Core clock speed
500 MHz
771 MHz
Boost Clock
784 MHz
Transistor count
1508 Million
3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology
65 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
87.81
Floating-point performance
2,107 gflops
Length
241 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
800 MHz
5400 MHz
Memory bandwidth
172.8 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
DirectX 10, Shader 4.0
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
CUDA
3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
119 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Check Price
Check Price
