GeForce 8800M GTX SLI vs Quadro M4000
When comparing GeForce 8800M GTX SLI and Quadro M4000, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce 8800M GTX SLI and Quadro M4000 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce 8800M GTX SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 8800M GTX SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 8800M GTX SLI here:
Main Specs
GeForce 8800M GTX SLI
Quadro M4000
Power consumption (TDP)
130 Watt
120 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1 x 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR3
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
512 MB
8 GB
Display Connectors
4x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce 8800M GTX SLI has 8% more power consumption, than Quadro M4000.
GeForce 8800M GTX SLI has 504 GB more memory, than Quadro M4000.
GeForce 8800M GTX SLI is used in Laptops, and Quadro M4000 - in Desktops.
GeForce 8800M GTX SLI is build with G9x architecture, and Quadro M4000 - with Maxwell 2.0.
Core clock speed of Quadro M4000 is 273 MHz higher, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI.
GeForce 8800M GTX SLI is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and Quadro M4000 - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro M4000 is 5208 MHz higher, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
6−7
35−40
ultra / 1080p
4−5
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
16−18
60−65
medium / 1080p
7−8
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 412% more, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI.
high / 1080p
10−12
55−60
ultra / 1080p
9−10
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
35−40
4K / 2160p
−
18−20
low / 720p
21−24
100−110
medium / 1080p
10−12
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Battlefield 5 is 423% more, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI.
low / 768p
130−140
250−260
medium / 768p
100−110
220−230
ultra / 1080p
50−55
180−190
QHD / 1440p
27−30
110−120
4K / 2160p
−
70−75
high / 768p
75−80
210−220
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 151% more, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
18−20
−
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI.
low / 768p
75−80
120−130
medium / 768p
55−60
110−120
ultra / 1080p
30−35
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Dota 2 is 109% more, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI.
high / 1080p
7−8
45−50
ultra / 1080p
7−8
40−45
QHD / 1440p
−
27−30
4K / 2160p
3−4
14−16
low / 720p
16−18
80−85
medium / 1080p
8−9
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Far Cry 5 is 487% more, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI.
high / 1080p
14−16
60−65
ultra / 1080p
10−11
45−50
QHD / 1440p
−
27−30
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
low / 720p
55−60
180−190
medium / 1080p
21−24
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Fortnite is 292% more, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI.
high / 1080p
10−12
60−65
ultra / 1080p
10−11
45−50
QHD / 1440p
1−2
30−35
4K / 2160p
−
24−27
low / 720p
24−27
100−110
medium / 1080p
12−14
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 425% more, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI.
low / 768p
50−55
140−150
medium / 768p
40−45
120−130
high / 1080p
10−12
70−75
ultra / 1080p
6−7
30−35
QHD / 1440p
0−1
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 232% more, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI.
high / 1080p
4−5
24−27
ultra / 1080p
3−4
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
0−1
8−9
low / 720p
10−12
65−70
medium / 1080p
6−7
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Metro Exodus is 500% more, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI.
low / 768p
90−95
130−140
high / 1080p
85−90
−
ultra / 1080p
75−80
−
medium / 1080p
90−95
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Minecraft is 41% more, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
30−35
100−110
medium / 1080p
16−18
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 119% more, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI.
high / 1080p
−
24−27
ultra / 1080p
7−8
16−18
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−11
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
low / 720p
10−12
65−70
medium / 1080p
10−11
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 344% more, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI.
low / 768p
21−24
130−140
medium / 768p
16−18
85−90
high / 1080p
8−9
45−50
ultra / 1080p
6−7
24−27
4K / 2160p
−
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 461% more, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI.
low / 768p
85−90
90−95
medium / 768p
40−45
60−65
ultra / 1080p
18−20
50−55
high / 768p
35−40
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in World of Tanks is 45% more, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI.
Full Specs
GeForce 8800M GTX SLI
Quadro M4000
Architecture
G9x
Maxwell 2.0
Code name
NB8E-GTX
GM204
Type
Laptop
Workstation
Release date
19 November 2007
29 June 2015
Pipelines
192
1664
Core clock speed
500 MHz
773 MHz
Transistor count
1508 Million
5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology
65 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
80.39
Floating-point performance
2,573 gflops
Length
241 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
800 MHz
6008 MHz
Shared memory
-
DirectX
DirectX 10, Shader 4.0
12
Shader Model
5
OpenGL
4.5
OpenCL
1.2
Vulkan
+
CUDA
5.2
SLI options
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
299 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
3D Vision Pro
+
Mosaic
+
Width
1" (2.5 cm)
Number of simultaneous displays
4
nView Desktop Management
+
Multi-display synchronization
Quadro Sync
High-Performance Video I/O6
+
Check Price
Check Price
