GeForce 8800M GTX SLI vs Tesla C2070
When choosing between GeForce 8800M GTX SLI and Tesla C2070, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce 8800M GTX SLI and Tesla C2070.
Tesla C2070
GeForce 8800M GTX SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 8800M GTX SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 8800M GTX SLI here:
Main Specs
GeForce 8800M GTX SLI | Tesla C2070 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 238 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | |
Check Price |
- Tesla C2070 has 83% more power consumption, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI.
- GeForce 8800M GTX SLI has 506 GB more memory, than Tesla C2070.
- GeForce 8800M GTX SLI is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2070 - in Desktops.
- GeForce 8800M GTX SLI is build with G9x architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Tesla C2070 is 74 MHz higher, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI.
- GeForce 8800M GTX SLI is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla C2070 is 2188 MHz higher, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Battlefield 5 is 169% more, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
4K / 2160p | − | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 82% more, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 31% more, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Dota 2 is 76% more, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Far Cry 5 is 175% more, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Fortnite is 107% more, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Forza Horizon 4 is 150% more, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Grand Theft Auto V is 96% more, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Metro Exodus is 166% more, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | − |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Minecraft is 25% more, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 52% more, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 111% more, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 153% more, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in World of Tanks is 34% more, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI. |
Full Specs
GeForce 8800M GTX SLI | Tesla C2070 | |
Architecture | G9x | Fermi |
Code name | NB8E-GTX | GF100 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 19 November 2007 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 192 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 574 MHz |
Transistor count | 1508 Million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 32.14 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 2988 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 143.4 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | DirectX 10, Shader 4.0 | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | 2.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce 8800M GTX SLI vs Radeon HD 8770M
- GeForce 8800M GTX SLI vs GeForce GTX 275
- Tesla C2070 vs Radeon HD 8770M
- Tesla C2070 vs GeForce GTX 275
- GeForce 8800M GTX SLI vs GeForce GTX 590
- GeForce 8800M GTX SLI vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
- Tesla C2070 vs GeForce GTX 590
- Tesla C2070 vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost