FirePro M4000 vs GeForce 920A
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro M4000 and GeForce 920A, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro M4000 stacks up against GeForce 920A, check out specs charts below.
GeForce 920A
FirePro M4000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M4000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M4000 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M4000 | GeForce 920A | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 33 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 33 Watt.
- FirePro M4000 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and GeForce 920A uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GeForce 920A has 1 GB more memory, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 is used in Mobile workstations, and GeForce 920A - in Desktops.
- FirePro M4000 is build with GCN architecture, and GeForce 920A - with Kepler 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 920A is 354 MHz higher, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 and GeForce 920A are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M4000 is 2498 MHz higher, than GeForce 920A.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1800% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920A in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| high / 768p | 90−95 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 275% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Dota 2 is 165% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Fortnite is 204% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 18−20 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | − |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 200% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 90−95 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Minecraft is 79% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 362% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| low / 768p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| medium / 768p | 18−20 | − |
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in World of Tanks is 128% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M4000 | GeForce 920A | |
| Architecture | GCN | Kepler 2.0 |
| Code name | Cape Verde GLM | GK208B |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 July 2012 | 13 March 2015 |
| Pipelines | 512 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 954 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 915 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 21.60 | 30.53 |
| Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | 441.6 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 2002 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 16.02 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 3.5 | |
| Bus support | n/a | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 79 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Form factor | MXM-A | |
| StereoOutput3D | + | |
| Check Price |