FirePro M5950 vs GeForce 920A
When comparing FirePro M5950 and GeForce 920A, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro M5950 and GeForce 920A is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce 920A
FirePro M5950 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M5950 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M5950 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M5950 | GeForce 920A | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 33 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro M5950 has 6% more power consumption, than GeForce 920A.
- FirePro M5950 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and GeForce 920A uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GeForce 920A has 1 GB more memory, than FirePro M5950.
- FirePro M5950 is used in Mobile workstations, and GeForce 920A - in Desktops.
- FirePro M5950 is build with Terascale 2 architecture, and GeForce 920A - with Kepler 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 920A is 229 MHz higher, than FirePro M5950.
- FirePro M5950 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GeForce 920A - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce 920A is 1102 MHz higher, than FirePro M5950.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1400% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920A in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 203% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| FirePro M5950 and GeForce 920A have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Dota 2 is 124% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Fortnite is 159% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | − |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Grand Theft Auto V is 147% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Minecraft is 12% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 250% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 768p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | − |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in World of Tanks is 108% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M5950 | GeForce 920A | |
| Architecture | Terascale 2 | Kepler 2.0 |
| Code name | Whistler-XT | GK208B |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 13 April 2011 | 13 March 2015 |
| Pipelines | 480 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 954 MHz |
| Transistor count | 716 million | 915 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.40 | 30.53 |
| Floating-point performance | 696.0 gflops | 441.6 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 2002 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 57 GB/s | 16.02 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 3.5 | |
| Bus support | n/a | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 67 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Form factor | MXM-A | |
| Check Price |