FirePro S7150 vs GeForce 920A
When comparing FirePro S7150 and GeForce 920A, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro S7150 and GeForce 920A is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro S7150
GeForce 920A
Main Specs
| FirePro S7150 | GeForce 920A | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 33 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- FirePro S7150 has 354% more power consumption, than GeForce 920A.
- FirePro S7150 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce 920A uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- FirePro S7150 has 6 GB more memory, than GeForce 920A.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- FirePro S7150 is build with GCN 3.0 architecture, and GeForce 920A - with Kepler 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 920A is 34 MHz higher, than FirePro S7150.
- FirePro S7150 and GeForce 920A are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S7150 is 2998 MHz higher, than GeForce 920A.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 6100% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro S7150 and GeForce 920A have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | − |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 685% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| FirePro S7150 and GeForce 920A have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Dota 2 is 313% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Fortnite is 740% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 18−20 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Grand Theft Auto V is 663% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Minecraft is 75% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 1212% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 0−1 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | − |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 0−1 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in World of Tanks is 188% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro S7150 | GeForce 920A | |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Kepler 2.0 |
| Code name | Tonga | GK208B |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 February 2016 | 13 March 2015 |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 920 MHz | 954 MHz |
| Transistor count | 5,000 million | 915 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 117.8 | 30.53 |
| Floating-point performance | 3,763 gflops | 441.6 gflops |
| Length | 241 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 2002 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 16.02 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 3.5 | |