FireStream 9370 vs GeForce 920A
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FireStream 9370 and GeForce 920A, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FireStream 9370 stacks up against GeForce 920A, check out specs charts below.
FireStream 9370
GeForce 920A
Main Specs
| FireStream 9370 | GeForce 920A | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 33 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
- FireStream 9370 has 581% more power consumption, than GeForce 920A.
- FireStream 9370 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce 920A uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- FireStream 9370 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce 920A.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and GeForce 920A - with Kepler 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 920A is 129 MHz higher, than FireStream 9370.
- FireStream 9370 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GeForce 920A - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 2598 MHz higher, than GeForce 920A.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2700% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920A in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
| low / 768p | 190−200 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 160−170 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 410% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Dota 2 is 231% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Fortnite is 295% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 18−20 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | − |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 305% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Minecraft is 36% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 550% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | − |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in World of Tanks is 176% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9370 | GeForce 920A | |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Kepler 2.0 |
| Code name | Cypress | GK208B |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release date | 23 June 2010 | 13 March 2015 |
| Pipelines | 1600 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 954 MHz |
| Transistor count | 2,154 million | 915 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 66.00 | 30.53 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,640.0 gflops | 441.6 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | 2002 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 147.2 GB/s | 16.02 GB/s |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 3.5 | |