GeForce 920A vs GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q
When comparing GeForce 920A and GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce 920A and GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce 920A
GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 920A | GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5, GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce 920A has 10% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q.
- GeForce 920A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce 920A.
- GeForce 920A is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q - in Laptops.
- GeForce 920A is build with Kepler 2.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q is 66 MHz higher, than GeForce 920A.
- GeForce 920A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q - by 12 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q is 5998 MHz higher, than GeForce 920A.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 6100% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce 920A and GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 16−18 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 685% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| GeForce 920A and GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Dota 2 is 313% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Fortnite is 740% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 65−70 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 663% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Minecraft is 75% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 1212% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in World of Tanks is 188% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 920A | GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q | |
| Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Turing |
| Code name | GK208B | N18P-G0 / N18P-G61 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 13 March 2015 | 23 April 2019 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1024 |
| Core clock speed | 954 MHz | 1020 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1245 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 915 million | 4,700 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 30.53 | 72.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 441.6 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz | 8000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 16.02 GB/s | 112.1 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.140 |
| CUDA | 3.5 | 7.5 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |