GeForce 920A vs GeForce MX150
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce 920A and GeForce MX150, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce 920A stacks up against GeForce MX150, check out specs charts below.
GeForce 920A
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce MX150 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX150 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX150 here:
Main Specs
GeForce 920A | GeForce MX150 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 10 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce 920A has 230% more power consumption, than GeForce MX150.
- GeForce 920A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GeForce MX150 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce MX150 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce 920A.
- GeForce 920A is used in Desktops, and GeForce MX150 - in Laptops.
- GeForce 920A is build with Kepler 2.0 architecture, and GeForce MX150 - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX150 is 514 MHz higher, than GeForce 920A.
- GeForce 920A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce MX150 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX150 is 4006 MHz higher, than GeForce 920A.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2400% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920A in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 180−190 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 150−160 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 80−85 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | − | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 385% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Dota 2 is 220% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Fortnite is 295% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | − | 65−70 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Grand Theft Auto V is 278% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
ultra / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Minecraft is 36% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 487% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | − | 27−30 |
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in World of Tanks is 168% more, than GeForce 920A. |
Full Specs
GeForce 920A | GeForce MX150 | |
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Pascal |
Code name | GK208B | N17S-G1 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 13 March 2015 | 16 May 2017 |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 954 MHz | 1468 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1532 MHz | |
Transistor count | 915 million | 1,800 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 30.53 | 24.91 |
Floating-point performance | 441.6 gflops | 1,127 gflops |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz | 6008 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 16.02 GB/s | 40.1 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 3.5 | 6.1 |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |