GeForce 920A vs GRID K280Q
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce 920A and GRID K280Q, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce 920A stacks up against GRID K280Q, check out specs charts below.
GeForce 920A
GRID K280Q
Main Specs
| GeForce 920A | GRID K280Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- GRID K280Q has 581% more power consumption, than GeForce 920A.
- GeForce 920A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GRID K280Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GRID K280Q has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce 920A.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce 920A is build with Kepler 2.0 architecture, and GRID K280Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 920A is 209 MHz higher, than GRID K280Q.
- GeForce 920A and GRID K280Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K280Q is 2998 MHz higher, than GeForce 920A.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2400% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920A in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 180−190 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 150−160 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 80−85 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 45−50 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 16−18 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 385% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Dota 2 is 220% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Fortnite is 295% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | − | 65−70 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 278% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Minecraft is 36% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 487% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | − | 27−30 |
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in World of Tanks is 168% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 920A | GRID K280Q | |
| Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | GK208B | GK104 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 13 March 2015 | 28 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 954 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Transistor count | 915 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 30.53 | 95.36 |
| Floating-point performance | 441.6 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 16.02 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 3.5 | 3.0 |