GeForce 920A vs Iris Graphics 540
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce 920A and Iris Graphics 540, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce 920A stacks up against Iris Graphics 540, check out specs charts below.
GeForce 920A
Iris Graphics 540 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Graphics 540 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 540 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 920A | Iris Graphics 540 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
| Memory type | DDR3 | eDRAM |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 64 MB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce 920A has 120% more power consumption, than Iris Graphics 540.
- GeForce 920A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Iris Graphics 540 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- Iris Graphics 540 has 62 GB more memory, than GeForce 920A.
- GeForce 920A is used in Desktops, and Iris Graphics 540 - in Laptops.
- GeForce 920A is build with Kepler 2.0 architecture, and Iris Graphics 540 - with Gen. 9 Skylake.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 920A is 654 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 540.
- GeForce 920A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Graphics 540 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2000% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920A in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 150−160 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 65−70 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 16−18 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 303% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Dota 2 is 165% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Fortnite is 227% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | − | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Grand Theft Auto V is 226% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Minecraft is 83% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 362% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| medium / 768p | − | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in World of Tanks is 148% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 920A | Iris Graphics 540 | |
| Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Gen. 9 Skylake |
| Code name | GK208B | Skylake GT3e |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 13 March 2015 | 1 September 2015 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 48 |
| Core clock speed | 954 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1050 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 915 million | 189 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 30.53 | 50.40 |
| Floating-point performance | 441.6 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 16.02 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.97 |
| CUDA | 3.5 | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |