GeForce 920A vs Iris Plus Graphics 645
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce 920A and Iris Plus Graphics 645. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce 920A and Iris Plus Graphics 645. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce 920A
Iris Plus Graphics 645 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 645 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 645 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 920A | Iris Plus Graphics 645 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
| Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3/DDR4 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce 920A has 120% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
- GeForce 920A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- GeForce 920A is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 - in Laptops.
- GeForce 920A is build with Kepler 2.0 architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 - with Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 920A is 654 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
- GeForce 920A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1200% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920A in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 153% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Dota 2 is 96% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Fortnite is 113% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | − | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Grand Theft Auto V is 121% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Minecraft is 60% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 212% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | − | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in World of Tanks is 100% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 920A | Iris Plus Graphics 645 | |
| Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake |
| Code name | GK208B | Kaby Lake GT3e |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 13 March 2015 | 10 July 2019 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 48 |
| Core clock speed | 954 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 915 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 30.53 | 50.40 |
| Floating-point performance | 441.6 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 16.02 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.103 |
| CUDA | 3.5 | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |