GeForce 920A vs Iris Pro Graphics 6200
In this comparison between GeForce 920A and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce 920A will be the best choice, for others Iris Pro Graphics 6200 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce 920A
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 6200 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 920A | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x1 |
| Memory type | DDR3 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce 920A has 120% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
- GeForce 920A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 uses PCIe 2.0 x1 interface.
- GeForce 920A is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - in Laptops.
- GeForce 920A is build with Kepler 2.0 architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - with Gen. 8 Broadwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 920A is 654 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
- GeForce 920A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1200% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920A in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 171% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Dota 2 is 106% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Fortnite is 136% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | − | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 121% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Minecraft is 60% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 212% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | − | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in World of Tanks is 100% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 920A | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | |
| Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Gen. 8 Broadwell |
| Code name | GK208B | Broadwell GT3e |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 13 March 2015 | 2 June 2015 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 48 |
| Core clock speed | 954 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 915 million | 189 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 30.53 | 40.80 |
| Floating-point performance | 441.6 gflops | 883.2 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 16.02 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.80 |
| CUDA | 3.5 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |