GeForce 920A vs Quadro 4000

In this comparison between GeForce 920A and Quadro 4000 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce 920A will be the best choice, for others Quadro 4000 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

Main Specs

  GeForce 920A Quadro 4000
Power consumption (TDP) 33 Watt 142 Watt
Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin
Memory type DDR3 GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 2 GB
Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
  Check Price
  • Quadro 4000 has 330% more power consumption, than GeForce 920A.
  • GeForce 920A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Quadro 4000 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
  • GeForce 920A and Quadro 4000 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
  • Both cards are used in Desktops.
  • GeForce 920A is build with Kepler 2.0 architecture, and Quadro 4000 - with Fermi.
  • Core clock speed of GeForce 920A is 479 MHz higher, than Quadro 4000.
  • GeForce 920A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro 4000 - by 40 nm process technology.
  • Memory clock speed of Quadro 4000 is 806 MHz higher, than GeForce 920A.

Game benchmarks

high / 1080p 0−1 6−7
ultra / 1080p 4−5
QHD / 1440p 0−1 0−1
low / 720p 1−2 16−18
medium / 1080p 0−1 8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1600% more, than GeForce 920A.

Full Specs

  GeForce 920A Quadro 4000
Architecture Kepler 2.0 Fermi
Code name GK208B GF100
Type Desktop Workstation
Release date 13 March 2015 2 November 2010
Pipelines 384 256
Core clock speed 954 MHz 475 MHz
Transistor count 915 million 3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 40 nm
Texture fill rate 30.53 15.20
Floating-point performance 441.6 gflops 486.4 gflops
Length 241 mm
Memory bus width 64 Bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 2002 MHz 2808 MHz
Memory bandwidth 16.02 GB/s 89.86 GB/s
DirectX 12 (11_0) 12 (11_0)
Shader Model 5.1 5.1
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 1.2 1.1
Vulkan 1.1.126 N/A
CUDA 3.5 2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 44 Mh/s
  Check Price