GeForce 920A vs Quadro 5010M
When choosing between GeForce 920A and Quadro 5010M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce 920A and Quadro 5010M.
GeForce 920A
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Quadro 5010M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 5010M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 5010M here:
Main Specs
GeForce 920A | Quadro 5010M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 ECC |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro 5010M has 203% more power consumption, than GeForce 920A.
- GeForce 920A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Quadro 5010M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Quadro 5010M has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce 920A.
- GeForce 920A is used in Desktops, and Quadro 5010M - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce 920A is build with Kepler 2.0 architecture, and Quadro 5010M - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 920A is 504 MHz higher, than Quadro 5010M.
- GeForce 920A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro 5010M - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce 920A is 702 MHz higher, than Quadro 5010M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2100% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920A in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 70−75 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | − | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 325% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Dota 2 is 182% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Fortnite is 250% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | − | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Grand Theft Auto V is 252% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Minecraft is 36% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 425% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | − | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in World of Tanks is 148% more, than GeForce 920A. |
Full Specs
GeForce 920A | Quadro 5010M | |
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Fermi |
Code name | GK208B | N12E-Q5 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 13 March 2015 | 22 February 2011 |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 954 MHz | 450 MHz |
Transistor count | 915 million | 3,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 30.53 | 21.60 |
Floating-point performance | 441.6 gflops | 691.2 gflops |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz | 1300 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 16.02 GB/s | 83.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | 3.5 | 2.0 |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |