GeForce 920A vs Quadro K1100M
When comparing GeForce 920A and Quadro K1100M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce 920A and Quadro K1100M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce 920A
Quadro K1100M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K1100M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K1100M here:
Main Specs
GeForce 920A | Quadro K1100M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 45 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro K1100M has 36% more power consumption, than GeForce 920A.
- GeForce 920A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Quadro K1100M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- GeForce 920A and Quadro K1100M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- GeForce 920A is used in Desktops, and Quadro K1100M - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce 920A is build with Kepler 2.0 architecture, and Quadro K1100M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 920A is 249 MHz higher, than Quadro K1100M.
- GeForce 920A and Quadro K1100M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K1100M is 798 MHz higher, than GeForce 920A.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1100M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1200% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
GeForce 920A and Quadro K1100M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1100M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 178% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1100M in Dota 2 is 113% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
high / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1100M in Fortnite is 136% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | − | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1100M in Grand Theft Auto V is 147% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1100M in Minecraft is 50% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1100M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 212% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
medium / 768p | − | 10−11 |
high / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1100M in World of Tanks is 108% more, than GeForce 920A. |
Full Specs
GeForce 920A | Quadro K1100M | |
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Kepler |
Code name | GK208B | GK107 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 13 March 2015 | 23 July 2013 |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 954 MHz | 705 MHz |
Transistor count | 915 million | 1,270 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 30.53 | 22.59 |
Floating-point performance | 441.6 gflops | 542.2 gflops |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz | 2800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 16.02 GB/s | 44.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 3.5 | + |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 18 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |