GeForce 920A vs Quadro K2000M
When comparing GeForce 920A and Quadro K2000M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce 920A and Quadro K2000M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce 920A
Quadro K2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K2000M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 920A | Quadro K2000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro K2000M has 66% more power consumption, than GeForce 920A.
- GeForce 920A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Quadro K2000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- GeForce 920A and Quadro K2000M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- GeForce 920A is used in Desktops, and Quadro K2000M - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce 920A is build with Kepler 2.0 architecture, and Quadro K2000M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 920A is 209 MHz higher, than Quadro K2000M.
- GeForce 920A and Quadro K2000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce 920A is 202 MHz higher, than Quadro K2000M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1200% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920A in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 189% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Dota 2 is 106% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| high / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Fortnite is 136% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 150% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Minecraft is 69% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 250% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| medium / 768p | − | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in World of Tanks is 96% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 920A | Quadro K2000M | |
| Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | GK208B | N14P-Q3 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 13 March 2015 | 1 June 2012 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 954 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Transistor count | 915 million | 1,270 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 30.53 | 23.84 |
| Floating-point performance | 441.6 gflops | 572.2 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 16.02 GB/s | 28.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 3.5 | + |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 18 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |