GeForce 920A vs Quadro K3100M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce 920A and Quadro K3100M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce 920A and Quadro K3100M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce 920A
Quadro K3100M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K3100M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K3100M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 920A | Quadro K3100M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro K3100M has 127% more power consumption, than GeForce 920A.
- GeForce 920A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Quadro K3100M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Quadro K3100M has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce 920A.
- GeForce 920A is used in Desktops, and Quadro K3100M - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce 920A is build with Kepler 2.0 architecture, and Quadro K3100M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 920A is 248 MHz higher, than Quadro K3100M.
- GeForce 920A and Quadro K3100M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K3100M is 1198 MHz higher, than GeForce 920A.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2400% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920A in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K3100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 180−190 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 150−160 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 80−85 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 45−50 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 16−18 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 378% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Quadro K3100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 100−105 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Dota 2 is 217% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| high / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Fortnite is 272% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | − | 60−65 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Grand Theft Auto V is 278% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Minecraft is 36% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 487% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | − | 24−27 |
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in World of Tanks is 168% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 920A | Quadro K3100M | |
| Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | GK208B | N15E-Q1-A2 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 13 March 2015 | 23 July 2013 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 768 |
| Core clock speed | 954 MHz | 706 MHz |
| Transistor count | 915 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 30.53 | 45.18 |
| Floating-point performance | 441.6 gflops | 1,084 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 16.02 GB/s | 102.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 3.5 | + |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 44 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |