GeForce 920A vs Quadro M2000M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce 920A and Quadro M2000M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce 920A stacks up against Quadro M2000M, check out specs charts below.
GeForce 920A
Quadro M2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2000M here:
Main Specs
GeForce 920A | Quadro M2000M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 55 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro M2000M has 66% more power consumption, than GeForce 920A.
- GeForce 920A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Quadro M2000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- Quadro M2000M has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce 920A.
- GeForce 920A is used in Desktops, and Quadro M2000M - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce 920A is build with Kepler 2.0 architecture, and Quadro M2000M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M2000M is 84 MHz higher, than GeForce 920A.
- GeForce 920A and Quadro M2000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M2000M is 2998 MHz higher, than GeForce 920A.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3600% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | − | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 514% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
GeForce 920A and Quadro M2000M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Dota 2 is 279% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Fortnite is 422% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 410% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Minecraft is 49% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 737% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | − | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in World of Tanks is 180% more, than GeForce 920A. |
Full Specs
GeForce 920A | Quadro M2000M | |
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Maxwell |
Code name | GK208B | GM107 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 13 March 2015 | 2 October 2015 |
Pipelines | 384 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 954 MHz | 1038 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1197 MHz | |
Transistor count | 915 million | 1,870 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 30.53 | 43.92 |
Floating-point performance | 441.6 gflops | 1,405 gflops |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 16.02 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 3.5 | 5.0 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 173 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |