GeForce 920A vs Quadro M500M
In this comparison between GeForce 920A and Quadro M500M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce 920A will be the best choice, for others Quadro M500M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce 920A
Quadro M500M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M500M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M500M here:
Main Specs
GeForce 920A | Quadro M500M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 30 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce 920A has 10% more power consumption, than Quadro M500M.
- GeForce 920A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Quadro M500M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- GeForce 920A and Quadro M500M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- GeForce 920A is used in Desktops, and Quadro M500M - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce 920A is build with Kepler 2.0 architecture, and Quadro M500M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M500M is 75 MHz higher, than GeForce 920A.
- GeForce 920A and Quadro M500M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M500M is 2002 MHz higher, than GeForce 920A.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M500M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1200% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
GeForce 920A and Quadro M500M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M500M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 178% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M500M in Dota 2 is 113% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
high / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M500M in Fortnite is 136% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | − | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M500M in Grand Theft Auto V is 147% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M500M in Minecraft is 50% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M500M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 212% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
medium / 768p | − | 10−11 |
high / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M500M in World of Tanks is 108% more, than GeForce 920A. |
Full Specs
GeForce 920A | Quadro M500M | |
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Maxwell |
Code name | GK208B | GM108 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 13 March 2015 | 15 December 2015 |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 954 MHz | 1029 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | |
Transistor count | 915 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 30.53 | 17.98 |
Floating-point performance | 441.6 gflops | 863.2 gflops |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz | 4004 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 16.02 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 3.5 | 5.0 |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |