GeForce 920A vs Radeon Pro 460
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce 920A and Radeon Pro 460. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce 920A and Radeon Pro 460. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce 920A
Radeon Pro 460 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 460 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 460 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 920A | Radeon Pro 460 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Radeon Pro 460 has 6% more power consumption, than GeForce 920A.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x8 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon Pro 460 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce 920A.
- GeForce 920A is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 460 - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce 920A is build with Kepler 2.0 architecture, and Radeon Pro 460 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 920A is 54 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 460.
- GeForce 920A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 460 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 460 is 2998 MHz higher, than GeForce 920A.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3600% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 65−70 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 16−18 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 507% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| GeForce 920A and Radeon Pro 460 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Dota 2 is 279% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Fortnite is 422% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Grand Theft Auto V is 410% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Minecraft is 49% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 737% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | − | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in World of Tanks is 180% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 920A | Radeon Pro 460 | |
| Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Polaris |
| Code name | GK208B | Polaris 11 / Baffin XT |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 13 March 2015 | 8 August 2016 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1024 |
| Core clock speed | 954 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 907 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 915 million | 3,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 30.53 | 58.05 |
| Floating-point performance | 441.6 gflops | 1,858 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 16.02 GB/s | 81.28 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 3.5 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 227 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |