GeForce 920A vs Radeon PRO WX 3100
In this comparison between GeForce 920A and Radeon PRO WX 3100 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce 920A will be the best choice, for others Radeon PRO WX 3100 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce 920A
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon PRO WX 3100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon PRO WX 3100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon PRO WX 3100 here:
Main Specs
GeForce 920A | Radeon PRO WX 3100 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 65 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- Radeon PRO WX 3100 has 96% more power consumption, than GeForce 920A.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x8 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon PRO WX 3100 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce 920A.
- GeForce 920A is used in Desktops, and Radeon PRO WX 3100 - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce 920A is build with Kepler 2.0 architecture, and Radeon PRO WX 3100 - with Polaris.
- GeForce 920A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon PRO WX 3100 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon PRO WX 3100 is 3998 MHz higher, than GeForce 920A.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2700% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920A in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 170−180 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 90−95 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | − | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 130−140 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 439% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Dota 2 is 237% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Fortnite is 318% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | − | 70−75 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 331% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Minecraft is 49% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 550% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | − | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 100−105 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in World of Tanks is 188% more, than GeForce 920A. |
Full Specs
GeForce 920A | Radeon PRO WX 3100 | |
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Polaris |
Code name | GK208B | Polaris 12 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 13 March 2015 | 21 March 2017 |
Pipelines | 384 | 512 |
Core clock speed | 954 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1219 MHz | |
Transistor count | 915 million | 2,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 30.53 | 39.01 |
Floating-point performance | 441.6 gflops | 1,248 gflops |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz | 6000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 16.02 GB/s | 96 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 3.5 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |