GeForce 920A vs Radeon R9 M275
When comparing GeForce 920A and Radeon R9 M275, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce 920A and Radeon R9 M275 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce 920A
Radeon R9 M275 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M275 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M275 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 920A | Radeon R9 M275 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce 920A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Radeon R9 M275 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon R9 M275 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce 920A.
- GeForce 920A is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M275 - in Laptops.
- GeForce 920A is build with Kepler 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 M275 - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 920A is 29 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M275.
- GeForce 920A and Radeon R9 M275 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R9 M275 is 2498 MHz higher, than GeForce 920A.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M275 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1200% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| GeForce 920A and Radeon R9 M275 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M275 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 182% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M275 in Dota 2 is 113% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| high / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M275 in Fortnite is 136% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M275 in Grand Theft Auto V is 162% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M275 in Minecraft is 50% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M275 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 212% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | − | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M275 in World of Tanks is 108% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 920A | Radeon R9 M275 | |
| Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | GCN |
| Code name | GK208B | Venus |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 13 March 2015 | 1 August 2014 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 954 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 925 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 915 million | 1,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 30.53 | 37.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 441.6 gflops | 1,184 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz | 4500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 16.02 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 3.5 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 122 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |