GeForce 920A vs Tesla C2075

If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce 920A and Tesla C2075, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce 920A stacks up against Tesla C2075, check out specs charts below.

GeForce 920A

Tesla C2075 Check Price

Main Specs

	GeForce 920A	Tesla C2075
Power consumption (TDP)	33 Watt	247 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors		1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	6 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI
		Check Price

Tesla C2075 has 648% more power consumption, than GeForce 920A.
GeForce 920A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Tesla C2075 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Tesla C2075 has 4 GB more memory, than GeForce 920A.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GeForce 920A is build with Kepler 2.0 architecture, and Tesla C2075 - with Fermi 2.0.
Core clock speed of GeForce 920A is 380 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
GeForce 920A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2075 - by 40 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Tesla C2075 is 1130 MHz higher, than GeForce 920A.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	16−18
ultra / 1080p	−	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	4−5
low / 720p	1−2	35−40
medium / 1080p	0−1	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3600% more, than GeForce 920A.
high / 1080p	−	27−30
ultra / 1080p	−	21−24
QHD / 1440p	0−1	6−7
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
low / 720p	0−1	55−60
medium / 1080p	−	30−35
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	45−50	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce 920A.
low / 768p	60−65	210−220
medium / 768p	27−30	190−200
ultra / 1080p	7−8	100−110
QHD / 1440p	−	65−70
4K / 2160p	−	30−35
high / 768p	16−18	150−160
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 496% more, than GeForce 920A.
low / 768p	70−75	60−65
ultra / 1080p	0−1	45−50
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
GeForce 920A and Tesla C2075 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	45−50	110−120
medium / 768p	10−11	100−110
ultra / 1080p	0−1	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Dota 2 is 279% more, than GeForce 920A.
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	−	18−20
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
low / 720p	0−1	45−50
medium / 1080p	−	21−24
high / 1080p	−	27−30
ultra / 1080p	−	21−24
QHD / 1440p	−	14−16
low / 720p	21−24	110−120
medium / 1080p	0−1	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Fortnite is 422% more, than GeForce 920A.
high / 1080p	0−1	27−30
ultra / 1080p	−	21−24
QHD / 1440p	0−1	10−11
low / 720p	0−1	60−65
medium / 1080p	0−1	30−35
low / 768p	18−20	90−95
medium / 768p	−	80−85
high / 1080p	0−1	30−35
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
QHD / 1440p	0−1	4−5
medium / 720p	12−14	−
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Grand Theft Auto V is 384% more, than GeForce 920A.
high / 1080p	−	10−12
ultra / 1080p	−	8−9
4K / 2160p	−	1−2
low / 720p	0−1	30−35
medium / 1080p	−	14−16
low / 768p	75−80	110−120
high / 1080p	27−30	−
medium / 1080p	−	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Minecraft is 49% more, than GeForce 920A.
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
low / 720p	8−9	60−65
medium / 1080p	−	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 675% more, than GeForce 920A.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	9−10
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	30−35
medium / 1080p	−	18−20
low / 768p	0−1	60−65
medium / 768p	−	35−40
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	−	12−14
4K / 2160p	−	7−8
low / 768p	45−50	90−95
medium / 768p	14−16	60−65
ultra / 1080p	0−1	35−40
high / 768p	12−14	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in World of Tanks is 180% more, than GeForce 920A.

Full Specs

	GeForce 920A	Tesla C2075
Architecture	Kepler 2.0	Fermi 2.0
Code name	GK208B	GF110
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	13 March 2015	25 July 2011
Pipelines	384	448
Core clock speed	954 MHz	574 MHz
Transistor count	915 million	3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Texture fill rate	30.53	32.14
Floating-point performance	441.6 gflops	1,030.4 gflops
Length		248 mm
Memory bus width	64 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	2002 MHz	3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth	16.02 GB/s	150.3 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.1.126	N/A
CUDA	3.5	2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		94 Mh/s
		Check Price

GeForce 920A vs Tesla C2075

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares